TheBanyanTree: Life Stories 223
Tobie Shapiro
tobie at shpilchas.net
Wed May 23 07:36:59 PDT 2007
May 22, 2000000000007
Dear Courageous Explorers,
Feyna is doing her paper which is the
equivalent of a final exam for her English class.
It's supposed to be seven to eight pages long,
but the teacher won't kill you if it's longer.
Last time she handed in a paper for him, the
assignment specified five pages, and more if you
were inspired. She turned in a paper that was
twelve pages long, and he gave her a B because it
was too long. It's a weird class with a weird
instructor. It's supposed to be an English
class, and that's how it's described in the
school catalogue. English is a required subject,
so she signed up. When she got to the first
class, she looked around her and found she was
almost the only Caucasian in a room full of
Asians. The teacher is Asian, too. All the
books they have read and all the subjects they
have covered have been about the Asian American
experience. This paper she is working on right
up to the deadline, is an analysis and comparison
of two books by two Asian American authors on the
Asian American experience. One of them is active
in the political movements to achieve equality
and respect for Asian Americans. The other wants
to deny his Asian heritage and be, "white," like
everyone else. Well, I guess that leaves out the
African Americans, the Native Americans, Jewish
and Arabic Americans, Aboriginal Americans,
Pacific Islander Americans, Maori Americans.
There are all sorts of assumptions in being
white like "everyone else". Who, me? I'm a two
toned Semite.
I have no objection to teaching a class
on Asian studies. But that's what it should be
called. It's not an English class, really. The
emphasis has not been on literature, composition,
a broad base of writings in the English language,
an understanding of the structure of English, the
study of works of fiction, non-fiction. It has
been on the philosophy and issues of Asian
American identity, history and culture. Major
misnomer. Plus the teacher is very hard on
grades. I can't help but wonder if he dislikes
the students who are not Asian. But how can you
prove that? It would feel funny to me to write a
paper about Asian American identity when I'm not
Asian. "Paraphrase the differing views of Zia
and Liu. How do they differ in their perceptions
of being Asian American? Compare them. Give
examples. Explain which you prefer and why."
It's a little presumptuous to proffer a Jewish
opinion about Asian American identity. But this
is the final. It will be over, and she can go on
to a more advanced English class, maybe something
more balanced. Yes, yes: how does it feel to be
outside the mainstream for non Asians? Every
class is a Caucasian studies class. Try being
the minority on for size. But it doesn't justify
the approach to the class. It should have been
billed as ethnic studies.
Her paper is very good.
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
**************************************
Panacea on a Stick
The San Francisco Bay Area has always
been culturally active. All sorts of movements
and trends got their start here before spreading
out to the rest of the country, sometimes the
world. It was that way when my mother was
growing up, and absolutely scandalous when my
Great Aunt Anne went to UC Berkeley in the second
decade of the twentieth century. Before that,
there was the reputation that San Francisco was a
morally loose town, run by crazies, fanatics,
eccentrics and misfits. Berkeley was even worse.
Did people who were rejected by even San
Francisco's whacked standards wind up across the
bay in Berkeley?
Before the turn of the twentieth century,
the reputation for wildness, avant-gardeism went
back all the way to the gold rush, and even
before. The people in bay area history are
characters and forward thinkers, very forward.
And there were the cultural trends that shocked
every corner of the country except my home town.
It's a place to be, a place to thrive, a place to
thrive out loud. The men wear feathers and the
women climb trees. The children eat raw garlic.
Dogs and cats walk upright on their hind legs.
Horses got the vote back in 1878.
In the late 1970s, an eccentric named
Gary Warne inaugurated an organization in San
Francisco called, "The Gorilla Grotto". It was a
combined cafe, theater and educational
institution. It held meetings in the back of a
book store in a room lined with pillows. It was
like an alternate University extension. A
variety of classes and events were available.
You signed up and paid your fees. If you didn't
see the class or event you wanted, you could
suggest it, or offer to teach it yourself.
Monthly newsletters went out. The newsletters,
themselves, were a lesson in categorized chaos.
When I first got involved with the Gorilla
Grotto, it was through a man I knew who worked at
an underground newspaper in the city. They were
always doing profiles of odd characters and
people with arcane professions. They did a story
about me and my handwriting analysis. The person
they sent out to interview me was Randy Munyon, a
man too tall for me, as he broke the six foot
barrier. He was dark haired, and balding at an
early age. He took a liking to me and asked me
if I would go out with him. Well, of course I
would. He was a man and he liked me. That was
almost reason enough. He took care of his
personal hygiene, and that filled all the
requirements. It was Randy Munyon who suggested
I look into the Gorilla Grotto.
One of the most popular events they
offered was the night time walking tour of the
San Francisco sewers. There was no fecal
material involved. Troops of warmly clad and
sturdily shod adventurers would descend through a
chosen manhole and set out on an underground
hike, all clutching their flashlights and
following the guide who had done this dozens of
times. They also organized high class haut
cuisine picnics on the Golden Gate Bridge. When
I hooked up with them, I was interested in a
course in storytelling and stand up comedy that
was being taught by a man named Lee Glickstein.
He himself was a broken down stand up comic who
exuded enthusiasm, except when he was depressed.
Then he could barely move.
"I am sorry, but our stand up comedy and
story telling class has been cancelled because
the instructor cannot stand up or tell."
What did I think was the purpose of my
taking this course with professor Glickstein?
There had to be a purpose. It had to be going
somewhere. To take a class in anything for fun
and enjoyment was alien to the Shapiro ethic. I
convinced myself that, if properly trained and
inspired, I could make an excellent stand up
comic. It wasn't just that everyone laughed at
me. It was that I intended them to laugh at me.
What if I were truly professional at it? I had
plenty to say and even my father couldn't get in
the way. Besides, a great deal of what I would
intend people to laugh at was going to be my
father.
Is there humour in child abuse? There
is if you need it to survive. And I'd learned
that lesson well. I survived on my sense of
humour. Part of my role in the family was to be
the class clown. I liked best of all making my
mother laugh. It was most rewarding, because she
was usually depressed, suppressed, oppressed,
repressed. But she knew how to laugh, how to
laugh until tears came out of her eyes, and the
laughter was silent gasping for breath. Yes,
maybe I was intended to be a stand up comic.
Lee Glickstein was engaged to a woman who
was guest teaching the class with him. A
laughing couple. What a great division of
labour! We sat in a loose circle on the pillows
on the floor, and we each told a story to the
rest of the group. I haven't the foggiest notion
what story I told. I have no recollection.
After the first class, I got into a discussion
with Lee about what brought me to comedy.
Basically, I told him, you must laugh. It is
essential for enduring the unfathomable
childhood. Sometimes laughing and making other
people laugh was the only defense against a grim
and bellicose reality.
I told him about my Grama Lena and slowed myself down to act her part.
"Darling, whatever you want me to
do for you, no matter how vile,
would be MY PLEAZ-URE."
He cracked up. His fiancee cracked up.
We went back and forth with stories, jokes, and
conversation. He asked me what I did, and I
recited the list: I'm an artist, cellist,
musician, composer, handwriting expert, writer,
chef and probably something else that had slipped
my mind. We talked into the night. The next
day, he telephoned me and said he had a great
idea. He thought of himself as an impresario.
He wanted to plan an event with me. He wanted to
create a venue for exhibiting all my talents at
once. It would be a one human show: art work on
the walls, performance of my songs, readings of
my writings, eating of my food, and even a
demonstration of handwriting analysis if he could
figure out how to incorporate it. He was jazzed.
He was elated. He was so enthusiastic I could
hear him levitating on the other end of the
phone. He wanted to make me a star. He would be
my agent and manager.
The whole thing sounded so impossibly
good that I could hardly bear it. Here was an
answer to my primary question: what the heck to
do with me. Lee Glickstein and his fiance would
devote all their time to this project. He had
ideas for where, how, what, when, even publicity.
He believed in high standards with publicity.
Get the right people there to see me, and I would
bowl them over. I'd be famous over night. Oh,
good! I didn't want it to take too long. It
should all happen at once. From the dregs to the
pinnacle in one simple leap. I thought about
this and my history caught in my throat. I
decided to give him an admonishing speech.
"Lee. This sounds wonderful, and I'd
more than love to do it. But before we embark on
this venture, let me beg you not to start
anything you aren't going to finish. Do not let
me down. I've been let down before, and I can't
take another disappointment. Only do this if you
can promise me you will follow through."
I may have reworded it and said it
several times in different ways. He listened
attentively. He understood and empathized. He'd
been there, too. He vowed he was in this project
one hundred percent. He would not let me down.
The question was, could I keep up with him? I
said I vowed to try.
We started out with several meetings a
week so that he could be exposed to my work. The
first thing he wanted was for me to read my
writings to him. Come to his studio. I arrived
with a stack of paper with intense scrawl on it.
What did he want to hear? Funny or serious?
Maybe the combination special.
He told me just to sit on the kitchen
stool and read whatever I'd brought. He would
take notes, get an idea of the scope of my
writing. Go ahead, read. I sat there on the
stool that he'd set up in the cavernous room that
housed his studio. I read, kept asking him to
tell me when to stop. He wound his hand in a
tight circle, indicating for me to keep going.
He listened to hours of my work. He laughed. He
cried. He was outraged. He was reflective. We
did this for several nights.
"I had no idea how intense this was going
to be. You're a genius of course."
The words slinked in through my ear hole
and inflated my head briefly. Lucky for me that
I could balance this all with great blasts of
self loathing or my head may have exploded. Then
he wanted to hear my music. Bring him tapes.
Bring in my guitar. Allow him to study my music
until he understood it. Once again, he expressed
delight and a degree of awe. He pronounced me a
genius on this, too. Next on the agenda was for
him to see my artwork. Bring it in Friday.
Thursday night, he called having to reschedule.
We shot for Monday. Monday I brought over some
of my strange stamp art works, the assemblages.
He examined them quietly. The evening was over
early. He didn't say much. He apologized for
his state of mind. It was nothing I had done.
Come back Wednesday. We'll pick up where we left
off.
He called Wednesday afternoon, giving an
excuse. From then on, it was a series of
cancellations and flat telephone conversations.
I could see where this was going. So I called
him. I told him I was going to save him the
trouble of telling me he had to back out, by
letting him off the hook. I could tell that his
heart wasn't in it any more. Just go.
He thanked me effusively, bowing and
scraping, so grateful was he for my great, my
amazing magnanimity in letting him off the hook.
He said, "I just lost interest. It happens to
me. But thank you. Thank you. Oh, thank you
for your presence of mind, your generosity, your
understanding, your . . . "
I interrupted. "Wait a minute, Lee.
Before you praise me so highly for letting you
off the hook and being such an understanding
person, let me tell you how I feel about this. I
begged you before we started not even to begin if
you weren't going to follow through. I begged
you. Do you remember that? I told you I'd been
let down before and couldn't take another
disappointment. There was when you should have
bowed out, since you knew that you might lose
interest. It happens to you, you said. You have
disappointed me and hurt me. You've lost my
respect, damaged my self respect, and lost my
friendship. This was inexcusable. Feel guilty.
It might do you some good."
He uttered a single syllable. "Oh," and
very shortly after that, we hung up. I never
heard from him again, which is good, I think.
That is how we parted, my disparate talents still
very much discrete, my will broken, that loss of
faith in one more friendly, well intentioned
human being. Lee had been sliding into a deep
depression. I went into one also.
No one stepped in or flew in, or suddenly
appeared to save me. Every once in a great
while, I'd hear his name mentioned in the context
of some comedy show. I didn't find him funny.
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
¦
**************************************
--
Tobie Helene Shapiro
Berkeley, California USA
tobie at shpilchas.net
More information about the TheBanyanTree
mailing list